Comments Thread For: Dana White Says There is 'Zero Chance' Jake Paul Will Fight Conor McGregor

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

UFC President Dana White has rejected the possibility of a future exhibition between company superstar Conor McGregor and Youtuber Jake Paul. Paul, who has a massive social media following, took part in his second professional boxing match last month, as the co-featured pay-per-view attraction to the Mike Tyson vs. Roy Jones exhibition clash.
[Click Here To Read More]

[Nightfall]

Paul will always duck real boxers. He knows that his head would get handed to him🥊

[ShoulderRoll]

McGregor has no choice but to do what his boss tells him.

[Jab jab boom]

It’s one thing to let your money guy lose to one of the best boxers ever, but if he got Nate Robinson’d against a YouTube guy, there’s no coming back from that.

[Patsfan bri]

I think he beats Connor in a boxing match.

[Rapscallion]

McGregor won't fight Jake Paul (Paul isn't any challenge says Dana White), yet McGregor won't fight undefeated multi-weight level champion Terence Crawford either despite Crawford's proposal for two fights with the first being in the Octagon and then the second in the boxing ring. Face it, McGregor is a fraud whose career has been carefully managed to cover up his limited talents. If McGregor took the Jake Paul boxing match, he'd lose by a quick knockout. And if he took Crawford's two fight proposal, McGregor would lose first in the Octagon by knockout followed by a knockout in the boxing match. That's why Conor McGregor won't fight Jake Paul or Terence Crawford.

[Ry92]

McGregor won't fight Jake Paul (Paul isn't any challenge says Dana White), yet McGregor won't fight undefeated multi-weight level champion Terence Crawford either despite Crawford's proposal for two fights with the first being in the Octagon and then the second in the boxing ring. Face it, McGregor is a fraud whose career has been carefully managed to cover up his limited talents. If McGregor took the Jake Paul boxing match, he'd lose by a quick knockout. And if he took Crawford's two fight proposal, McGregor would lose first in the Octagon by knockout followed by a knockout in the boxing match. That's why Conor McGregor won't fight Jake Paul or Terence Crawford.

Dude its a business as well most casuals still are barely even aware of who crawford is he has no promotion and lacks a quality name so his market is low so no low reward high risk mcgregor can fight atleast 40 ppl and make more $ than vs crawford. Anyways this **** is silly on crossover worth watching is mcgregor vs pac or masdival vs canelo n this 1 especially based upon ko n lack of tech ability ngannou vs wilder. Other than that crossovers should only be done with a best of 3 even u see me my sport i see you yours then we meet in middle kickboxing or if say nieky holzken r tryone spong won a belt in boxing then challenged ufc guy like masdival or jones. Its be watchable and a competetive crossover for those guys are pedigreed kickboxers who with learning some take down defense would be able compete well in mma ect

[Ry92]

Mcgregor has to re establish self at lightweight capture gold again outside having masdival and diaz for super big money options also still capable of only 2 crossovers to make huge $ pac n canelo so mcgregor is set up super nice if can beat porier and rewin gold again also we know khabib coming back for 1- 2 more fights within the next 2 yrs if mcgregor wins gold its solid for sure cause so much $ on the line. So mcgregor got literally atleast 4 different 50m a fight options outside doing paul crossovers 2 of those options pacquiao and masdival i see happening with possible khabib return

[Elotero]

UFC President Dana White has rejected the possibility of a future exhibition between company superstar Conor McGregor and Youtuber Jake Paul. Paul, who has a massive social media following, took part in his second professional boxing match last month, as the co-featured pay-per-view attraction to the Mike Tyson vs. Roy Jones exhibition clash.
[Click Here To Read More]

Typo at the end there, Logal Paul?