Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder Dismisses Michael Grant Comparison

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder Dismisses Michael Grant Comparison

    When asked on a recent conference call if he sees any similarities between him and another 6-foot-7 heavyweight who got exposed it what turned out to be his only title shot, Wilder politely dismissed comparisons to Michael Grant. Lennox Lewis overwhelmed Grant, dropped him three times and knocked him out in the second round of their April 2000 heavyweight championship match at Madison Square Garden.

    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Well.. Wilder just might beat Stiverne, but Wlad vs Wilder would be exactly like Lewis vs Grant.

    Comment


    • #3
      Unless my memory deceives me Grant was a far better boxer. Not that Wilder has to be on par skill wise 'cause their isn't a heavyweight out there right now that is anywhere as good as Lennox was.

      Comment


      • #4
        Lol. Beyonce Wilder couldn't even shine Michael Grants shoes. Grant would have KOd Wilder.

        He got TKOd by Zelenoff FFS.

        Comment


        • #5
          Grant

          Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
          When asked on a recent conference call if he sees any similarities between him and another 6-foot-7 heavyweight who got exposed it what turned out to be his only title shot, Wilder politely dismissed comparisons to Michael Grant. Lennox Lewis overwhelmed Grant, dropped him three times and knocked him out in the second round of their April 2000 heavyweight championship match at Madison Square Garden.

          [Click Here To Read More]
          I know he doesn't have a whole lotta credibility now, but at least
          Grant beat Golota and Obed Sullivan (better than a journeyman at the time)...People were picking Grant, whether they want to admit it now or not

          Comment


          • #6
            Being big has become a basic requirement in the HW division but it's not enough on its own. So far we know Wilder is big but not a whole lot else.

            Comment


            • #7
              is stiverne as good a win as golota? that is the real question here

              Comment


              • #8
                Jury's still out on Wilder but we should see how good or bad he is, when he faces Stiverne later this month. Wilder has a lot of things going for him that people don't give him credit for. Wilder has the 'killer instinct' that many fighters lack, including Michael Grant. When I watch Wilder, he looks like a young bad a$$ George Foreman who wanted to put a hurtin' on ya.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by - Ram Raid - View Post
                  Unless my memory deceives me Grant was a far better boxer. Not that Wilder has to be on par skill wise 'cause their isn't a heavyweight out there right now that is anywhere as good as Lennox was.
                  Yes, your memory is shot. Grant was AWFUL. No skills, no balance. Nice guy, but an awful fighter. Wilder isn't any better skillwise, but he is in no way an inferior boxer because Grant's boxing skills were a zero.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 80sFighter View Post
                    Being big has become a basic requirement in the HW division but it's not enough on its own. So far we know Wilder is big but not a whole lot else.
                    Size has been plenty enough for Wlad. If he was 6'1" and 220lbs he would have been retired ten years ago. Fact.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP