Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Adamek vs Firtha or McBride in Play For April 16 in Poland

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Adamek vs Firtha or McBride in Play For April 16 in Poland

    To prepare for signed battle with one of the Klitschko brothers, which is scheduled for September, former two division champion Tomasz Adamek (43-1, 28 KOs) could possible face one of two opponents on April 16 in Poland. Sources tell BoxingScene.com/Bokser.org that 6'6 Kevin McBride (35-8-1, 29 KOs) or 6'6 Nicolai Firtha (19-8-1, 8 KOs), could become the opponent for Adamek, although other names are being considered.

    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    wow thats worse than Haye vs Mormeck 2, but at least we know Adamek will fight Wlad or Vitali in September.

    Comment


    • #3
      Kevin ****ing McBride?

      jesus adamek just pick a bouncer from the local pub he'd give u a better fight. McBride hadn't fought in years, came back about 6 months ago and lost to a journeyman.

      Then got beat by Skelton in prizefighter

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by gingeralbino View Post
        Kevin ****ing McBride?

        jesus adamek just pick a bouncer from the local pub he'd give u a better fight. McBride hadn't fought in years, came back about 6 months ago and lost to a journeyman.

        Then got beat by Skelton in prizefighter
        Yeah terrible fight.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hahahahaha a REAL warrior lmao!

          Comment


          • #6
            So is Mcbride better then Audley?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by flat1985 View Post
              So is Mcbride better then Audley?
              50-50. Audley is a lot more skilled, although McBride is willing to actually throw a few punches.

              column barret would decision McBride easily though so id go with audley. just.

              Comment


              • #8
                on 2nd thoughts though, McBride beat Tyson. That involved getting into the same ring as him and not having a heart attack.

                McBride might have the edge.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by gingeralbino View Post
                  on 2nd thoughts though, McBride beat Tyson. That involved getting into the same ring as him and not having a heart attack.

                  McBride might have the edge.
                  I dont know Mcbride looked terrible in his last fight

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by gingeralbino View Post
                    on 2nd thoughts though, McBride beat Tyson. That involved getting into the same ring as him and not having a heart attack.

                    McBride might have the edge.
                    To be fair Tyson was well past it and McBride was so much taller that Tyson's punches could barely reach his face. On the plus side I backed McBride to win that fight at around 5 to 1 cos of his height advantage

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP