Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It Could Be a Super Fight, But These Are Not Super Middleweights

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It Could Be a Super Fight, But These Are Not Super Middleweights

    By Michael Katz - Forget the biggest fight in European history (ever hear of World War II?), the transatlantic version of Leonard-Hearns and all that offensive hype. Joe Calzaghe and Mikkel Kessler, fine young men and talented boxers, could not carry spit buckets for such predecessors. The very nomenclature for Saturday’s main event in, sadly, another case of dueling dates, is offensive. To paraphrase the late Sonny Werblin, what the hell is a supermiddleweight? For one thing, it is one word. A “super middleweight” (two words) would be someone like Sugar Ray Robinson, Marvelous Marvin Hagler. One word, and supermiddleweight is just another bastard weight class that dilutes the game.

    It’s not as bad as some, especially “superbantamweight,” which is what Werblin, then head of Madison Square Garden, was asking about when his favorite promoter, Don King, brought Wilfredo Gomez to the arena. That was a weight class created by Jose Sulaiman to accommodate Gomez, who would have been weakened trying to make bantamweight and was too small to really be a full featherweight (see Salvador Sanchez).

    I’m not sure why supermiddleweight was created, except maybe to accomodate lazy old middleweights a bit of turf, or to give Europeans a chance not to compete against the Haglers. Whatever. At this point, it hardly matters. From super to nuts, Calzaghe and Kessler have what it takes to give us a superior battle in Cardiff, Wales, on HBO, probably less than an hour before Showtime pay-per-view cranks up its main event, Juan Manuel Marquez against the dangerous Rocky Juarez. [details]

  • #2
    Katz is talking **** again.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by PIPBoy 2000 View Post
      Katz is talking **** again.
      There is NO WAY possible that you read the article that fast. Your comment came within a minute of the posting

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by PIPBoy 2000 View Post
        Katz is talking **** again.
        He has a valid point. I sometimes think that these subdivison are pampering the **** out of today's fighters.

        But when you think of the Calzaghe Kessler fight, you have to praise the lord that they had a weight for this title bout. No matter what weight.

        Comment


        • #5
          EDIT: only read the first paragraph so far.. hopefully it changes...

          EDIT EDIT: nevermind it does get a lot better thankfully
          Last edited by Kball15; 10-30-2007, 09:37 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            He also says Marquez-Juarez is showtime PPV, which it isnt in case anyone was conserned

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Kball15 View Post
              Yea katz is awful IMO. Always talkin **** about something...

              WHen EVERYBODY else is heaping praise on the fight and fighters, this guys writes ****? why?!

              This is VERY good fight between VERY good fighters. Kessler may even be great, who knows right? He is young, and could prove to be great some day. who knows. The fact that he immediatly said he couldnt even hold a spit bucket for Leonard or Hearns is rediculous. this guy blows

              EDIT: only read the first paragraph so far.. hopefully it changes...
              Kessler would have to beat Calzaghe and few more TOP fighters to be even be in the same league as Leonard or Hearns.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
                There is NO WAY possible that you read the article that fast. Your comment came within a minute of the posting
                True, but I have read the first two paragraphs and I just can't stand the biased **** anymore.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
                  Kessler would have to beat Calzaghe and few more TOP fighters to be even be in the same league as Leonard or Hearns.
                  yea exactly, and im not saying he will or anything, but he's young and shows plenty of potential... why immediatly rule him out?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
                    Kessler would have to beat Calzaghe and few more TOP fighters to be even be in the same league as Leonard or Hearns.
                    I agree with YOU on that-- but it aint their fault. There just isn't that type of eye-grabbing competition around to catapult them.

                    I don't understand why he calls the excitement that's leading up to this fight 'offensive'. WTF!? What would it take him to get excited over something? What possible match-up would be considered 'good' to this guy, if he goes so far as to call Calzaghe-Kessler offensive..?

                    Dudes need to stop living in the past and factor in the fact that we are in TODAY... It's not like we can make the great match-ups of yesteryear. You would need those great fighters to be all near eachother in weight and developement.
                    Last edited by K-Nan; 10-30-2007, 09:43 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP